Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Aerodynamics of a Bio-inspired Flexible Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicle

H. Liu

Abstract


MAVs (micro air vehicles) with a maximal dimension of 15 cm and nominal flight speeds around 10 m/s, normally operate in a Reynolds number regime of 105 or lower, in which most natural flyers including insects, bats and birds fly. Like such natural flyers, the wing structures of MAVs are often flexible and tend to deform by aerodynamic and inertial forces during flight. Consequently, the aero/fluid and structural dynamics of these flyers are closely linked to each other, making the entire flight vehicle difficult to analyze. We have recently developed a hummingbird-inspired, flapping flexible wing MAV with a weight of 2.4 - 3.0 gf and a wingspan of 10 - 12 cm. In this study, we carry out an integrated study of the flexible wing aerodynamics of this flapping MAV by means of an in-house computational fluid dynamic (CFD) solver. A CFD model that has a realistic wing planform and can mimic realistic flexible wing kinematics measured by a high-speed camera filming system is established, which provides a quantitative prediction of unsteady aerodynamics of the four-winged MAV in terms of vortex and wake structures and their relationship with aerodynamic force generation. The CFD-based results show that a leading edge vortex (LEV) and hence a strong negative pressure region are generated on the wings during half stroke. As observed in insect flapping flight, This LEV likely plays a crucial role in the lift and/or thrust force-production in the MAV flight.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shyy, W., Liang, Y., Tang, J., Viieru, D. & Liu, H. 2007. Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers. New York, NY.: Cambridge University Press.

Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C-K., Cesnik, C. E. S. & Liu, H. 2010. Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 46: 284-327

Mueller, T. J. (editor) 2001. Fixed and flapping wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicle applications. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 195. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Pines, D. J. & Bohorquez, F. 2006. Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. J. Aircr. 43: 290–305

Platzer, M., Jones, K., Young, J. & Lai, J. 2008. Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges. AIAA J. 46: 2136–49

Stanford, B., Ifju, P., Albertani, R. & Shyy, W. 2008. Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44: 258–94

Liu, H. (section editor) 2010. Micro Air Vehicles, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering edited by Blockley, R. & Shyy, W. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Wootton, R. J. 1981. Support and deformability in insect wings. J. Zool. 193: 447-68

Young, J., Walker, S. M., Bomphrey, R. J., Taylor, G. K. & Thomas, A. L. R. 2009. Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science 325: 1549-52

Mountcastle, A. M. & Daniel, T. L. 2009. Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance. Exp. Fluids 46: 873-82

Du, G. & Sun, M. 2010. Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies. J. Exp. Biol. 213: 2273-83

Nakata, T. & Liu, H. 2011. Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach. Proc. R Soc. B (doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1023)

Weis-Fogh, T. 1973. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J. Exp. Biol. 59: 169-230

de Croon, G. C. H. E., de Clercq, K. M. E., Ruijsink, R., Remes, B. & de Wagter, C. 2009. Designing, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the DelFly. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1: 71-97

Zheng, L., Wang, X., Khan, A., Vallance, R. R., Mittal, R. & Hedrick, T. L. 2009. A combined experimental-numerical study of the role of wing flexibility in insect flight. AIAA-2009-382

Liu, H. 2009. Integrated modelling of insect flight: from morphology, kinematics to aerodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 228: 439-59

Aono, H., Liang, F. & Liu, H. 2008. Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study. J. Exp. Biol. 211: 239-57

Maeda, M., Gao, N., Nishihashi, N. & Liu, H. 2010. A free-flight simulation of insect flapping flight. J. Aero Aqua Bio-mech. 1: 71-79

Steger, J. L. & Rizk, Y. M. 1985. Generation of three-dimensional body-fitted coordinates using hyperbolic partial differential equations. NASA TM-86753

Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F-O. & Sane, S. P. 1999. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284: 1954-60

Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P. & Thomas, A. L. R. 1996. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384 626-30

Liu, H. & Aono, H. 2009. Size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics: an integrated computational study. Bioinsp. Biomim. 4: 015002

Ellington, C. P. 1984. The aerodynamics of insect flight. IV. Aerodynamic mechanisms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305: 79-113

Wakeling, J. M. & Ellington, C. P. 1997. Dragonfly flight II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. J. Exp. Biol. 200: 557-82




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21535%2FProICIUS.2011.v7.369

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.