Towards a Generalized Disturbance Model for Small UAVs: Concepts, Taxonomy, and Theoretical Foundations

Devishree Murugesan, Vishnu Kumar Kaliappan

Abstract


Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operate within the complex atmospheric boundary layer, yet current research often relies on simplistic additive white Gaussian noise or constant wind vectors that fail to reflect real-world airflow correlations. This conceptual paper addresses this gap by establishing the theoretical foundations for a Generalized Disturbance Model (GDM) specifically tailored for micro and small-scale aerial platforms. The GDM is predicated on a multi-tier taxonomy categorizing disturbances into three domains: stochastic atmospheric turbulence (refined von Kármán and Dryden models), deterministic spatial gradients (urban canyons and forest canopies), and platform-induced internal perturbations (sensor vibration and center-of-gravity shifts). We introduce the “Disturbance Influence Matrix” (DIM), a mathematical construct that maps environmental energy states to specific force and moment vectors acting on the UAV’s body frame. This matrix accounts for the vehicle’s geometry and aerodynamic coefficients, providing a deterministic link between the environment and resulting flight path deviations. Furthermore, the framework explores “Disturbance Observability,” theorizing how onboard IMU and GPS data can be inverted to estimate the state of the surrounding atmosphere in real-time. By formalizing the mathematical structure used to describe aero-environmental interactions, this work provides a rigorous benchmarking framework for evaluating disturbance-rejection controllers and adaptive navigation algorithms. The theoretical insights aim to move the field toward “environmentally-aware” autonomy, where UAVs can actively exploit local wind patterns for energy-efficient flight in critical applications like search and rescue.

References


Allen, Michael. “Autonomous Soaring for Improved Endurance of a Small Uninhabitated Air Vehicle”. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-1025.

Baik, Jong-Jin, and Jae-Jin Kim. “A Numerical Study of Flow and Pollutant Dispersion Characteristics in Urban Street Canyons”. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38, no. 11 (1999): 1576–89. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038%253C1576:ANSOFA%253E2.0.CO;2.

Beal, T. R. “Digital Simulation of Atmospheric Turbulence for Dryden and von Karman Models”. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 16, no. 1 (1993): 132–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11437.

Cho, Am, Jihoon Kim, Sanghyo Lee, and Changdon Kee. “Wind Estimation and Airspeed Calibration Using a UAV with a Single-Antenna GPS Receiver and Pitot Tube”. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 47, no. 1 (2011): 109–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5705663.

Hunter, L. J., G. T. Johnson, and I. D. Watson. “An Investigation of Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Flow Regimes within the Urban Canyon”. Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere 26, no. 4 (1992): 425–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1272(92)90049-X.

Langelaan, Jack W., Nicholas Alley, and James Neidhoefer. “Wind Field Estimation for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles”. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 34, no. 4 (2011): 1016–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52532.

Langelaan, Jack. “Long Distance/Duration Trajectory Optimization for Small UAVs”. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-6737.

Lee, Je Hyeon, Hakki Erhan Sevil, Atilla Dogan, and David Hullender. “Estimation of Maneuvering Aircraft States and Time-Varying Wind with Turbulence”. Aerospace Science and Technology 31, no. 1 (2013): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.09.009.

Mahony, Robert, Vijay Kumar, and Peter Corke. “Multirotor Aerial Vehicles: Modeling, Estimation, and Control of Quadrotor”. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, no. 3 (2012): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2206474.

Pounds, P., R. Mahony, and P. Corke. “Modelling and Control of a Large Quadrotor Robot”. Control Engineering Practice 18, no. 7 (2010): 691–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.02.008.

Raffo, Guilherme V., Manuel G. Ortega, and Francisco R. Rubio. “An Integral Predictive/Nonlinear H∞ Control Structure for a Quadrotor Helicopter”. Automatica 46, no. 1 (2010): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.018.

Watkins, Simon, Juliette Milbank, Benjamin J. Loxton, and William H. Melbourne. “Atmospheric Winds and Their Implications for Microair Vehicles”. AIAA Journal 44, no. 11 (2006): 2591–2600. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22670.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.