Safety Considerations in the Design and Testing of Rotary-Wing UAVs

Agus Budiyono, Kakuya Iwata

Abstract


Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), particularly rotary-wing models, have gained significant traction in a variety of industries, from surveillance and surveying to delivery services and disaster management. As the applications of these systems increase, ensuring their safe operation becomes paramount. This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of the safety considerations necessary in the design and testing phases of rotary-wing UAVs. Our research is divided into two main sections: the design considerations and testing protocols. In the design section, we delve into the necessary safety measures, including propeller safety, rotor balance, control systems, battery safety, and the potential acoustic and vibration impacts. We suggest design solutions aimed at minimizing safety risks associated with each of these factors. The testing protocol section evaluates the importance of rigorous testing under diverse conditions to ensure UAVs respond safely to various operational and emergency scenarios. We focus on propeller performance, engine reliability, control systems' responsiveness, and battery durability, among others. Additionally, we discuss the significance of environmental testing, which analyzes UAV performance under different weather conditions. We provide a holistic view of rotary-wing UAV safety, blending design, and testing considerations into a comprehensive safety protocol. Our research aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in UAV safety and inform better design and testing practices for safer UAV operations.

Keywords


Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) testing, safety consideration, testing protocol, safety measures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balestrieri, E., Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Picariello, F., & Tudosa, I. (2021). Sensors and measurements for UAV safety: An overview. Sensors, 21(24), 8253.

Barrett, D., Wang, D., Ahmad, A., & Mahimkar, V. (2017). Using mmWave sensors to enhance drone safety and productivity. Texas Instruments White Paper SPYY001.

Bergevin, D. H. (1993). Challenges of testing manned and unmanned aerial vehicles with reconnaissance payloads. Airborne Reconnaissance XVII, 2023, 284–292.

Bucheli, S., Kroening, D., Martins, R., & Natraj, A. (2015). From AgentSpeak to C for safety considerations in unmanned aerial vehicles. Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems: 16th Annual Conference, TAROS 2015, Liverpool, UK, September 8-10, 2015, Proceedings 16, 69–81.

Cawthorne, D., & Devos, A. (2020). Capability caution in UAV design. 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 1572–1581.

Denney, E., & Pai, G. (2016). Safety considerations for UAS ground-based detect and avoid. 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 1–10.

Hirling, O. (2021). Operational Safety Considerations for the Type Certification of Light Unmanned Aircraft Systems [Phdthesis]. Technische Universität München.

Igarashi, H., Noake, T., Okoshi, S., Iwata, K., Hoshi, T., & Kimura, T. (2021). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Protective Glasses for Small UAV Propellers: a Report on preliminary experiments. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics (ISR), 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISR50024.2021.9419550

Jordan, S., Moore, J., Hovet, S., Box, J., Perry, J., Kirsche, K., Lewis, D., & Tse, Z. T. H. (2018). State-of-the-art technologies for UAV inspections. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 12(2), 151–164.

Lee, D., Hess, D. J., & Heldeweg, M. A. (2022). Safety and privacy regulations for unmanned aerial vehicles: A multiple comparative analysis. Technology in Society, 71, 102079.

Murphy, R. R., Pratt, K. S., & Burke, J. L. (2008). Crew roles and operational protocols for rotary-wing micro-UAVs in close urban environments. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 73–80.

Namian, M., Khalid, M., Wang, G., & Turkan, Y. (2021). Revealing safety risks of unmanned aerial vehicles in construction. Transportation Research Record, 2675(11), 334–347.

Neogi, N., Bhamidipati, K., Uhlig, D., Ortiz, A., & Krauss, J. (2007). Engineering safety and reliability into UAV systems: mitigating the ground impact hazard. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 6510.

Peckham, R., & Sinha, R. (2019). Anarchitectures of health: Futures for the biomedical drone. Global Public Health, 14(8), 1204–1219.

Pető, R. (2016). SOME SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES OF UAVS–I. SECURITY REVIEW, 93.

Raja, V., Gnanasekaran, R. K., Rajendran, P., Mohd Ali, A., Rasheed, R., AL-bonsrulah, H. A., & Al-Bahrani, M. (2022). Asymmetrical damage aspects based investigations on the disc brake of long-range UAVs through verified computational coupled approaches. Symmetry, 14(10), 2035.

Schmidt, T., & Pretschner, A. (2022). StellaUAV: A Tool for Testing the Safe Behavior of UAVs with Scenario-Based Testing (Tools and Artifact Track). 2022 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), 37–48.

Uhlig, D., Bhamidipati, K., & Neogi, N. (2006). Safety and reliability within UAV construction. 2006 Ieee/Aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1–9.

Wang, G., Hollar, D., Sayger, S., Zhu, Z., Buckeridge, J., Li, J., Chong, J., Duffield, C., Ryu, D., & Hu, W. (2016). Risk considerations in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the construction industry. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 6(4).

Weibel, Roland E, & Hansman, R. J. (2006). Safety considerations for operation of unmanned aerial vehicles in the national airspace system [Techreport].

Weibel, Roland Everett. (2005). Safety considerations for operation of different classes of unmanned aerial vehicles in the national airspace system [Phdthesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281%2Fzenodo.8381895

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.